Writing a ‘SLANT’ Like the Crack of An ASS

28 02 2012

Just before I went to bed I peeked at the Internet News.Scrolling I found a Post by a YAHOO “Contributor”: Texan Mark Whittington. The article was dated 02/24/2012. The title…
‘Penn Judge: Muslims Allowed to Attack People for Insulting Mohammed’,

a very interesting piece when an open minded, world wise reader sees it for WHAT it really is.At the start the true weight , and WISDOM, is presented for the smarter evaluation of the proffered event through the linking to the ORIGINAL OBSERVER and LEGALLY trained


At the conclusion of Jurist Turley’s post there were 202 comments very much like this:
“mespo727272 1, February 24, 2012 at 8:13 am

I’ve had some interesting experiences in Pennsylvania Unified Court System. The judges in the Courts of Common Pleas are generally pretty competent people with law degrees. The ones at the magisterial
district level as in this case — not so much. They are not even required to be lawyers and many are not. They are magistrates in most every sense but handle “minor” cases. They are a good argument agianst popular election of judges. There is a reason they call the district courts “minor” courts.”

Or this: “Anonymously Yours 1, February 24, 2012 at 8:03 am

I wonder if a Muslim atheist zombie was attacked, if it would make a difference?

The right to ignore stupid is also the right to peacefully assemble….”

The YAHOO “CLIFF NOTED” post received 12,815 comments, bundled thusly:

Bill L./ Houston, TX= “So by the same definition, someone could legally attack judge Martin because they were obligated to defend the Constitution.”

CROX/ ?,?= “Only in Islam could someone get away with this. Imagine a christian beating up a muslim man because he wore a halloween christian outfit. CAIR would be outraged.” ( Note to “CROX”, ‘All Hallow’s Eve IS a ‘CHRISTO-PAGAN’ observance.)

It NEVER ceases to amaze me when the OCRE JOURNALISTS are so in “need” of a recognition fix as when their latest version of “CHAR WARS” hasn’t found a “SNEW’QI” to graphically WADDLE into a “Qindal” flash reader.

The version, as told by the person that HAD done “SOME” research is concise and filled with THOUGHT and background knitted together with the staples of diverse viewpoints. Not be a close proximity to the “Niggerhead”,Texas property of Governor Rick Perry.To place two sides of the article’s issue…
“I fail to see the relevance of the victim’s attitude toward Muslims or religion generally. He had a protected right to walk in the parade and not be assaulted for his views. While the judge laments that “[i]t’s unfortunate that some people use the First Amendment to deliberately provoke others,” that is precisely what the Framers had in mind if Thomas Paine is any measure.

Notably, reports indicate that Elbayomy called police because he thought it was a crime to be disrespectful to Muhammed. The judge appears to reference this by noting that in some countries you can be put to death for such an offense. Those countries are called oppressive countries. This is a free country where it is not a crime to insult someone’s religion — despite a counter-trend in some Western countries.”

Of course Mr. Whittington just happens to “CONDENSE” the crux of his purloined post into the perfect “STROM”, (NOT a misspelling!), something that is running rip-shod through the “PAL-IN/ -ER” audience as mentioned in a recent ROLLING STONE Magazine article.

There’s not much more to say after sending someone to read MATT TIABBI… you just CAN’T make much MORE sense.

Except… Congratulations YAHOO! When are you going to start YOUR updated version of “YELLOW KID” ? (http://xroads.virginia.edu/~ma04/wood/ykid/intro.htm)